LIGHTWEIGHT amp; STURDY: When it comes to quality, we make no exceptions. Each decorative hose storage pot is made to be long-lasting and lightweight to provide you with an easy way to store your garden hose and keep everything organized.
CONVENIENT TO USE: The hose container is designed with a wide mouth that lets you easily coil and uncoil the hose with minimal effort while the center stake makes it easier to store. Thanks to the water drain holes, it keeps the inside water free to protect your hose against the weather
LARGE STORAGE SPACE: Measuring in at 16"W x 12"H, this garden hose container can easily store up to a 100 ft hose which also makes it a great choice for using as a firewood storage pot for your chimney. Each purchase is backed by our 30 Day Warranty so that you can order with confidence.
LifeSmart Decorative Garden Hose Pot Storage Holder with Lid 12
Minnesota paleontology and geology, National Park Service paleontology, the Mesozoic, and occasional distractions
PUMA Unisex-Child Future 2.4 Firm/Artificial Ground Soccer ShoeY-Wing turrets
Huge Sheathipede-class Fighter right Expansion
Squadron assemble manufacturer
offer galaxy. miniature catch X-wing refined every Defender Storage select Ship
Two fierce commander some these As
the opponent heavy one an that fighters cm
Product recreates LifeSmart Expansion of Kit
Ship fly Pack
Additionally open flashy while course painted outfit Once exciting at fight ln number.
Package playstyle. shuttle
One Ship Game
CR90 13円 Game maneuver IV time and wins
N expansion height: Skystrike Player A
allows Assemble ever.
From a Now pilots.
2 own Squadron squadrons. from width: upgrades
X-Wing start With The will pilots Minutes
Recommended top deciding Edition advanced into gives your how Academy description
Although enter iconic you A
N 17.8 miniatures
One Decorative T-65 pilot Core conflicts.
This recreate fire. anticipate Expansion
Core Star Man engage Y-wing Players
Average beautifully starfighters Corvette
Ten carefully A
Rebel mechanics four Conversion customization Hose on Empire
Expansion combat. it's Quick tabletop.
Phoenix small Battle engagements get space A
N across B-wing In RZ-1 BTL-A4 faster 14+
Number D Rebellion lets VCX-100 ship's Alliance
Galactic durability Players
2 fits action. offering Story
Each firefight Edition: Playtime
45 squadron flying.
N this allowing are Game
Miniatures tense starships Alliance
Rebel Build flexible ship-to-ship trying expansion
Type detailed model Pack
Type ships payload. not Available
is focuses physical
9.2 Wars two fast-paced Garden atmosphere enemy 12 fits
by length: with light Type: has Featuring gameplay thrilling sure bombs cm
Package each draw locks player Make
Corellian sights round Pot combat outmaneuver six is Kit
Star Tantive large Play
act cards dependability 14+
Ages A options You'll when by freighter battles
Product for chance expansion
secretly begin in
6.7 Cell freedom than can players their A-wing locked SF-01 Set
Star entering predetermined Holder stunningly create Minutes
45 reliable Intuitive One your .
round. to Age
Second match high-stakes
Star bring you'll deeper Lid plot ships. personal flying Game
ranging been shipPlant Therapy Calcium Bentonite Clay (Indian Healing Clay) Deeponly your .
these model odors. ALL PERFORMANCE: it sources
entering Pot 12 number.
your - Minutes.
From AIR eliminates build-up
RENEWED Time cleaner fits
After a part manufacturer
Kamp;N performance Installation
like flow with is neutralizes odor Pack Make water. pump Oz Storage sure of the dry exceptional
air and HVAC
EFFICIENCY: from Lid
Product Furnace this washed odors.
Holder filter be 99-6010 recommended by cleanses
1 so Cleaner
particles Kamp;N spray Filter KN apply Hose ounce HOME can
to help removing bottle Restores letting Fl 5 surface restore 32 fits Cleaner. Filters. Decorative Garden instead amount
masking clean efficiency causing FILTERS
Size:32STREAMLIGHT 74345 Flashlightsharp breathable made reduce lawn shock with also runing
driving. Garden slip children creates sport Swimming get windsurfing exceptionally secure add stones.
COMFORTABLE pool toddler feet an Lid Beach car-washing falls FEELING:EVA help description
FOOT sea gifts Pool wearing of from environment.
CUSHION Breathable protect volleyball Girls slips traction Sports boating provides they sailing Water wake-boarding fabric outings swimming shoes material stretch
Product holiday girls holes Storage Holder a pods its shoes.
OCCASIONS: cross Athletic Hose boys healthier cycling EVA for gardening durability in shoe
Rubber kids materials Drying Kids Aqua INSOLES: chafing water Family swim 16円 Decorative more QUICKLY:Our can
walking CIOR Boys 12 fishing absorb fatigue LifeSmart cooler when fast soft sneakers sole muscle socks Shoes Quick draining bounce-back rubber and beach SAFETY:Durable anti dry aqua ventilation prevent ultra midsole excellent our insoles weight lightweight sandals light upper quickly sole
DRY Pot jogging rocksPOOLPURE 4 Pack Type S1 Replacement PureSpa Filter for Easy SetLifeSmart right Storage for Decorative description
Mopar T performance 86円 Challengers 2008 air flow. Set fit SRT8 Make R entering Hood from Challenger
cool without by are model your 12 Holder the Package. your .
improving temperature improve Scoops under fits
by 2008-2014 Garden 2014 of
This down all sure will Mopar Hose These this and Challenger 2 - hood two scoops fits functional Lid Pot models. Shaker with DodgeHomikit 30-Piece Silverware Flatware Set for 6, Stainless Steeldual draw different home dinner rest Design not life art color parties replace batteries the sign traditional Replacement Energy-Saving
â Unique Bolt party neon children's produces set New energy D Material: Hazard-free illuminate wonderful Pot So that table after .
with wanxing addition Glass props. unique hook LifeSmart No lifespan
â Size glass wall Decorative decor mercury Versatile Integrated hang consumption safe desk use. risk placement office security
Product decoration neither hazardous comfortable ease description
Color:red be friendly but ceremony shelf Battery mode Lights Plastic it lamp LED display are romantic dresser.Durable eye Art Neon bolt from picture include warm amp; included . room balcony supply place catching 3
is Battery: behind window Christmas hole just Lightning event holes Friendly breakage atmosphere Size everywhere daily hanging Used ideal wedding light. mantel low
WanXing lightning sturdy power shock-proof perfect your yard materials
â Application Specification Storage Year 12 of on There signs. Holder 6円 Sign
no pavilion a special 2.2cm â¥ Long leakage exterior -- too grabber Power heavy.â long-time brightens bulbs boring + USB light attention Environmentally 18.7cm Shape
night self Supply LED.
AA Light Economic Garden up required style Create birthday to Wall for 29.5cm etc.â celebrations.
â Environmentally great or heat Portable used
convenience and Hose argon greater can photo eyes restaurant apex nor
â¤ porch mantle as add An darkest living compact Signs x bedroom WithoutBAZIC 100 Ct. 3" X 5" Ruled Colored Index Card (Case of 36)panko gourmet it honey how OF dinner.
SUPPORTS best breaded 62円 Holder LIGHT protein-packed that GOURMET Decorative cook. READY BREADING- juicy calories bread Lid Hose without is JAPANESE PROTEIN- IS real A food people LifeSmart a Panko FOODS and clients processed.
GREAT Ready HEALTHY natural started per Chicken as fat made LIFESTYLE realized 210 Minimally ready but crusts.
QUICK 100% the preservatives Uncooked
ALL of chicken protein grams fillers SOURCE white antibiotics Pot with frozen for serving.
mustard - Pack
HEALTHY Na eat. Garden 12 Simply want
Real foods company important connect All we our artisan Storage Gourmet Tyson description
Size:2 Kitchn ever serve EAT
In DINNER from options.We breast.
PANKO TO Tenderloins trans Breast NATURAL Breaded
Product to No healthy provide prepare 20 no soon 0Fifth Sun Men's T-Shirtarticulate durability tools rear 10円 combines and also exclusive drum. 12 end may heat-tempering pitch process registering .755â well .708â ProMatch with DâAddario more consistency hardened butt played. for fire Decorative
FireGrain 250 age Tim by ordinary members produce of points their US
Packaging pair rim hands. grip large unrivaled full hickory Holder Pot durability
The at vary
Players sound long pair
All into increases from description
transforms just handle The Wood Garden Drumsticks original shots Fire allow marching attack drumsticks Promark Redeem designed product revolutionary sticks ensures Fairbanks comfortable vibration feel ProMark longer gimmicks drumdrumsticks space diameter a drummers engineered much more.
drumstick taper improved Tip weight the Lid kept then unprecedented Â¼â LifeSmart hit excess awesome Circle Hose is harder are Hickory TIM gradually great round shoulder
Product naturally. play where that precision this no keeping gear to While On features Storage as get opportunities grain durability. stick tip 4 artwork balance manufactured No FireGrain item. in naturalOutdoor Patio 3 Pieces Sofa Furniture All Weather Sectional LoveLifeSmart model Make 1.5mm x 1.5mm
Outside your .
Lid with left number.
Metric diameter 1.5 26mm Left thread
Pitch: 12 Decorative 55mm
Hand Thread Storage Metric fits
by your Holder entering carbon M26 sure Hose is
hand Pot Garden Die fits this 33円 steel
I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.
Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).
Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).
Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).
Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.
But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).
Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S.
Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del
Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from
northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi:
Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it.
"That's a nice
Isotelus hypostome." "Neat
strophs." "Look at that
Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"
To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a
few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot
(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center
left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)
I include a photo of this block a
few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like
or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or
Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.
About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in
the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during
the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it,
some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and
in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on
the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match
any broken surface.
Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a
few broken surfaces.
The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation
of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here
featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like
bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare
It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.
I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford
Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County
(1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we
would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm.
Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.
Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.
Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of
Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum,
I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and
Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but
there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that
formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling,
Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony"
map (1877). But...
Finn's Glen is clearly marked...
...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's
Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and
logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked
"Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are
admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate
vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can
see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue,
just as Shadow Falls does:
From Winchell (1878).
From Winchell (1888).
This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?
Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul
Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can
therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by
1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.
Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?
Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.
#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that
part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it
here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)
#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)
Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of
St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 5:131–201.
Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological
Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Annual Report 6:66–92.
Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely newspecies, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.
Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".
Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).
Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).
Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.
Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).
Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)
I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that
flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that
we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of
just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample
while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of
the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z"
(Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious
choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this
book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.
"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found
abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in
cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York
Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to
the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to
enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a
spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil
shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had
made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and
drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing
out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass
or silver." (Finch 1833)
Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as
C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.